Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 August 2019

What's the point of business anyway?

What’s the point of businesses? Maybe, job making? On the face of it, creating jobs – assuming half decent conditions and fair pay – is a good thing. How about ‘wealth’ creation? But, again, what is that for? A good life, wealth for oneself, one’s family and future generations maybe.

I think, through business, that we can earn a good living but also that businesses should help to create a better world and fairer society through their activities. Captains - usually male - of industry may bash their fists on their walnut inlaid board-room tables and fume that business is about making money and that only charities do good but I think it vital that businesses, as a hugely important part of our society, have a duty to contribute more to it.
 
When I founded my business, eight years ago, I never wanted to be one of those business owners who bluster and whine about red tape. Also, I definitely did not want to be one of those people who you regularly see moaning about any attempt to give workers, society or the environment a break. Other than the occasional phone-slamming fury at HMRC’s lack of assistance I think I’ve stuck pretty much to those principles. Another thing I try not to be is cynical. I want to be optimistic, trusting even. My friends think I’m an idealist.
 
Business is a profound force in the world. Businesses do create jobs and profits. Taxes on these profits – not those squirrelled away in private offshore tax havens – fund our hospitals, schools and public services. Owners gain wealth. This wealth is supposed to trickle down to benefit us all. ‘Trickle’ says it all. If it was a ‘cascade’ or a ‘gush-down’ we might feel less angry about corporate greed. Trickle down is defunct and morally bankrupt as a concept. Wealth ossifies at the top. Rich get richer, poor stay poor. Both sides of the political spectrum say they recognise this. The Conservatives say they want to build a fairer Britain that works for everyone. Labour talks about the many not the few.
 
A key question is: at what cost is that wealth made? We have seen countless scandals based on profiteering that is often criminal – financial mis-selling, horse meat in burgers, fake breast implants, Paradise Papers, Panama Papers, siphoning off pension funds. And huge damage done to people, the environment and animals in the name of profit and, by association, business. 

Attempts to address business behaviour are met with scepticism from one side and complaints of over regulatory bureaucracy on the other. Corporate and social responsibility is dismissed as ‘greenwash’. Even ‘purpose’ – that latest buzzword – can be viewed cynically without proper certification, governance and action.
 
So how might a business contribute more, whilst still doing the day job? I think that contributing more leads to doing the day job better, more productively and ultimately more profitably. Doing good is also good business.
 
Business could start by paying the real living wage. Costs will increase in the short-term but long-term stability and productivity can be increased. Businesses could improve work-place well-being. A happy, healthy workforce will be more productive. Businesses could offer flexible working – encouraging family friendly working patterns. They could spend more in their supply chains locally and socially rather than at the cheapest rate. They could minimise any gender pay gap. They could adopt a diversity confident approach to employment. National government could even incentivise these behaviours with tax breaks.

Business is a powerful force but pursuit of profit alone can be damaging. Examples of egregious executive behaviour abound. But so do instances of businesses doing better – Richer Sounds, John Lewis and Riverford have all shown what can be done with innovative ownership and pay structures; B&Q and Marks and Spencer with supply chains.
 
We cannot wait for the government - paralysed by Brexit and lobbied to death by corporate interests - to act. We need to take action and the power ourselves - our great businesses can go further. And this, in a way, is the true purpose of business: to give people the agency to create a better world.
 
We all want to get on: get a good job, feel like our life has meaning. Earn a good living and make the world a better place. Let’s put this into the heart of our businesses too.

Thursday, 21 July 2016

New politics, a new hope

Is Brexit the rebellion of the voiceless?

No this is not another Star Wars themed blog!

Yesterday evening I attended the Nexit: What next for Plymouth and the South West event organised by RIO and the RSA at Devonport Guildhall. Around 200 people showed up - a sign of increasing politicization maybe and great to see so many engaged people. The waiting list was nearly as long as the attendance list apparently.

So a big turnout. And big ideas were discussed. There were initial ‘provocations’ from Molly Scott-Cato, Green MEP for the South West; George Cowcher, Director of Devon Chamber of Commerce, John Harris, a Guardian political journalist with a penchant for anything non-Westminster and two young people - Joe and Tom from Our Way Tech.

Molly asked for a second referendum, proportional representation and a need to reclaim our country. Citizen’s juries and a ‘progressive alliance’ of Greens, Lib-Dems and Labour were also mooted.

George gave a precise talk about business issues post Brexit. He said a majority of businesses wanted to remain in the EU and that there was still no real vision for what leaving looked like. In the South West we are particularly vulnerable to potential export problems caused by Brexit as 60% of our exports go to Europe. The main point that resonated with me was his direct question to business: “Exactly what ‘red tape’ do you want to change?” There is a lot of bluster about EU regulation but no-one can seemingly put their finger on what they want to remove.

Joe gave an eloquent and heartfelt speech (written on the back of a napkin in an impressive five minutes) expressing his fears about right-wing populism and invoking the spectre of fascism. Tom produced one of the quotes of the night: “A window has been broken - but that is good for people who fix windows.” I was left a bit bemused.

John Harris then gave an excellent talk on his approach, Brexit and the deep cynicism about politics. He said that a leave vote was just as valid as a remain vote and that we need to understand why Brexit happened. He called the Brexit vote a ‘rebellion of the voiceless’. In a telling moment he asked if anyone in the room had voted leave and only one or two people raised their hands.

We then had discussions in table groups. I was honoured to be asked to lead one of these. Our topics ranged widely over education, housing, environment, representation, inequality, economics and more.

We decided to develop our own new political party - the ‘Greater Britain Party’ - taking back the language of ‘great’ and ‘Britain’ from the far right with a new progressive manifesto:

1. Talk about politics in schools and everywhere
2. Proportional representation
3. Lower the voting age to 16
4. Sort housing and jobs
5. Improve environmental protection.

Ok, so some work needed on the detail but it was fun, lively, inclusive, honest and had real conviction.

What I found particularly refreshing was the ability to talk about politics in a community, non-party political setting. It felt natural and engaging. Yes, most people were in broad agreement but judging from responses there was a mix of Greens, Lib-Dems and Labour (new and old) and possibly some Conservatives too.

I think the event could have been improved with a ‘Leave’ key-note speaker and maybe we needed more dissent in the room around the opportunities presented by Brexit. A criticism could be that it was a large number of ‘Remainers’ talking to themselves.

John Harris wrapped things up with a call to arms - to find innovative solutions - one being found in Plymouth’s burgeoning social enterprise movement. His most powerful argument was his last. He said: “Dark forces are at work in the country - any attempt to overturn the referendum result through legal or other means could further disenfranchise the ‘voiceless’ turning them to more extreme politics.”

We must not let that happen.