Showing posts with label entrepreneurship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label entrepreneurship. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 August 2019

What's the point of business anyway?

What’s the point of businesses? Maybe, job making? On the face of it, creating jobs – assuming half decent conditions and fair pay – is a good thing. How about ‘wealth’ creation? But, again, what is that for? A good life, wealth for oneself, one’s family and future generations maybe.

I think, through business, that we can earn a good living but also that businesses should help to create a better world and fairer society through their activities. Captains - usually male - of industry may bash their fists on their walnut inlaid board-room tables and fume that business is about making money and that only charities do good but I think it vital that businesses, as a hugely important part of our society, have a duty to contribute more to it.
 
When I founded my business, eight years ago, I never wanted to be one of those business owners who bluster and whine about red tape. Also, I definitely did not want to be one of those people who you regularly see moaning about any attempt to give workers, society or the environment a break. Other than the occasional phone-slamming fury at HMRC’s lack of assistance I think I’ve stuck pretty much to those principles. Another thing I try not to be is cynical. I want to be optimistic, trusting even. My friends think I’m an idealist.
 
Business is a profound force in the world. Businesses do create jobs and profits. Taxes on these profits – not those squirrelled away in private offshore tax havens – fund our hospitals, schools and public services. Owners gain wealth. This wealth is supposed to trickle down to benefit us all. ‘Trickle’ says it all. If it was a ‘cascade’ or a ‘gush-down’ we might feel less angry about corporate greed. Trickle down is defunct and morally bankrupt as a concept. Wealth ossifies at the top. Rich get richer, poor stay poor. Both sides of the political spectrum say they recognise this. The Conservatives say they want to build a fairer Britain that works for everyone. Labour talks about the many not the few.
 
A key question is: at what cost is that wealth made? We have seen countless scandals based on profiteering that is often criminal – financial mis-selling, horse meat in burgers, fake breast implants, Paradise Papers, Panama Papers, siphoning off pension funds. And huge damage done to people, the environment and animals in the name of profit and, by association, business. 

Attempts to address business behaviour are met with scepticism from one side and complaints of over regulatory bureaucracy on the other. Corporate and social responsibility is dismissed as ‘greenwash’. Even ‘purpose’ – that latest buzzword – can be viewed cynically without proper certification, governance and action.
 
So how might a business contribute more, whilst still doing the day job? I think that contributing more leads to doing the day job better, more productively and ultimately more profitably. Doing good is also good business.
 
Business could start by paying the real living wage. Costs will increase in the short-term but long-term stability and productivity can be increased. Businesses could improve work-place well-being. A happy, healthy workforce will be more productive. Businesses could offer flexible working – encouraging family friendly working patterns. They could spend more in their supply chains locally and socially rather than at the cheapest rate. They could minimise any gender pay gap. They could adopt a diversity confident approach to employment. National government could even incentivise these behaviours with tax breaks.

Business is a powerful force but pursuit of profit alone can be damaging. Examples of egregious executive behaviour abound. But so do instances of businesses doing better – Richer Sounds, John Lewis and Riverford have all shown what can be done with innovative ownership and pay structures; B&Q and Marks and Spencer with supply chains.
 
We cannot wait for the government - paralysed by Brexit and lobbied to death by corporate interests - to act. We need to take action and the power ourselves - our great businesses can go further. And this, in a way, is the true purpose of business: to give people the agency to create a better world.
 
We all want to get on: get a good job, feel like our life has meaning. Earn a good living and make the world a better place. Let’s put this into the heart of our businesses too.

Friday, 22 May 2015

Ten myths of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship

1. Social enterprises are not-for-profit

WRONG!

'Not for profit' is a tricky phrase. Most social enterprises we see are ‘for profit’ but they dedicate their profits to achieving a good cause. Many social enterprises can also pay dividends from profits to investors and shareholders although this is usually restricted so that a majority of profit is dedicated to social causes.

2. Social enterprises can't pay salaries

WRONG!

Social enterprises can pay salaries and bonuses. A social enterprise that turns over tens of millions of pounds would be justified in paying their CEO a salary commensurate with running such a business. Directors of social enterprises - depending on the legal structure chosen - can also receive remuneration.

3. Social entrepreneurs can’t run a real business

WRONG!

Many social entrepreneurs come from successful business backgrounds. Social entrepreneurs are just like other entrepreneurs - some will succeed, some will change track and some businesses will fail. Most social entrepreneurs we meet are acutely aware of the need for their business to succeed so they can tackle the social issue that they are passionate about.

4. Social enterprises are just small businesses

WRONG!

There are many examples of large social enterprise businesses. Examples include large healthcare providers, big leisure trusts and universities. These are usually multi-million pound businesses with thousands of employees that have chosen social enterprise as their business model.

5. Social enterprises rely on grants

WRONG!

The whole point of being a social enterprise is that you trade to achieve a good cause. This means selling goods, services and products. Many social enterprises do access grants to help with start-up or with certain projects. Our advice is that a social enterprise should aim to use a grant as an investment with a view to developing an income generating idea once the grant runs out.

6. Social enterprises are automatically more sustainable

WRONG!

Social enterprises will only succeed if they can sell their services and products to customers. Many charities have survived for decades by relying on grants. That said, being dependent on grants can be challenging and developing successful, socially enterprising income streams can improve sustainability. Social enterprise should not be seen as a panacea - you need a strong business model, excellent market insight and an ability to deliver what customers want and need. Much like a ‘standard’ business really.

7. Social enterprises are more likely to fail

WRONG!

There is plenty of evidence that suggests that social enterprises are more resilient than their ‘standard’ private sector counterparts. We can speculate on the reasons for this including diverse income streams, social purpose and tenacity of social entrepreneurs. Recent research into longevity of the top 100 PLCs and top 100 social enterprises showed that, over the last 30 years, 41% of social enterprises have survived compared to 33% of PLCs.

8. Social enterprises are not scalable

WRONG!

Social enterprises are no different to ‘standard’ businesses in this regard. If you have a great product or service, a great team, the ambition, the drive, resolve and a clear plan for scaling there is no reason why you cannot significantly scale your business.

9. Social entrepreneurs are only concerned about social impact

WRONG!

Whilst most social entrepreneurs we meet are motivated by social or environmental issues they also understand that their business needs to be profitable to enable them to achieve their good cause goals. Focussing only on social impact without paying regard to finances, marketing, customers and all the standard business issues is a surefire path to trouble.

10. Social enterprises only operate in health and social care

WRONG!

Social enterprises operate in many sections of the economy. There are social enterprises in banking and finance, media, creative industries, business services, agriculture, tourism, fashion, education, entertainment, energy, heritage, housing, sports and more. Pretty much any business could be a social enterprise (maybe not selling cigarettes?).